Skip to main content

Table 1 (Inter)National recommendations on the reporting of ANA test results

From: International consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP): the bumpy road towards a consensus on reporting ANA results

 

Argentina [18]

Austria [17]

Belgium [16]

Brazil [9]

Germany [12]

Italy (FIRMA)

Netherlands [10]

ACR [6]

EASI/IUIS [8]

Remark

ANA method

+

+a

NS

+

NAb

NAb

+a

+

+a

aTests based on a restricted number of defined nuclear antigens are excluded

bRecommendations are restricted to IIF testing

Neg/Pos

+a

NS

NSb

NSa

NS

+c

NS

+d

NS

aScored for all cellular compartments

bScored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining

cCytoplasmic staining is considered ANA positive

dIncluding % controls with similar titer

Titer (end-titer)

+a

+ (1:1280)

+ (1:5000)

+ (1:640)

+ (1:5120)

+b

+a

+c

+c

aEnd-titer is not defined

bTitration is optional; staining intensity is alternative

cTitration to highest dilution

Pattern

+a

+a

+b

+a

+

+

+c

NS

+a

aIncluding cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns

bAt least centromere and cytoplasmic patterns

cReporting to the clinician is optional

Advise reflex testing

NS

NS

+a

NS

+b

+c

+c

+c

+c

aOnly if ANA is positive

bMention possible target antigens

cIf ANA is positive or disease associated with anti-SSA, -Jo1 (or other synthetases) and/or -RibP is suspected

Advise disease association

NS

NS

NS

+

+a

NS

NS

NS

NS

aIn light of diagnostic question posed

  1. Reflex testing may be either integrated in a testing algorithm or advised to do so
  2. ACR American College of Rheumatology, ANA anti-nuclear antibodies, EASI European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative, FIRMA Forum Interdisciplinare per la Ricerca nelle Mallattie Autoimmuni, IIF indirect immunofluorescence, IUIS International Union of Immunological Societies, NA not applicable, NS not specified